Melodie Wing engaged in CENSORSHIP at a board meeting, yet claims Wincam is a 1st Amendment Organization

4,996


SELFISH CENSORSHIP PRESIDENT,
ATTORNEY MELODIE A. WING, 
WANTS IT BOTH WAYS

UNBELIEVABLE CHUTZPAH!


AS THE OLD SAYING GOES

"her arrogance and impudence had 


offended many"




Vice Chairman Wilson pointed out that a part of the Open Meeting Law is having minutes of a meeting available for public review. She asked if the WinCAM meetings would have minutes available for public review for those meetings that are not open to the public. Ms. Wing explained that this has been WinCAM's goal for some time, however things are not currently at that point. She noted that WinCAM is a first amendment organization, therefore it is important that the public be included in the process. Ms. Wing pointed out that the directors have found on occasion the need to meet but not have the ability to follow the Open Meeting Law requirements. The Vice Chairman suggested that any meeting, whether publicor not, have minutes available for public review.

Vice Chairman Wilson pointed out that a part 

of the Open Meeting Law is having minutes 

of 


a meeting available for public review. She 

asked if the WinCAM meetings would have

 minutes available for public review for those meetings

 that are not open to the public. Ms. Wing 


explained that this has been WinCAM's goal


 for some time, however things are not 



currently at that point.


WING HAS BEEN IN FOR TEN LONG

YEARS WHEN WILL IT BE 'AT THAT 

POINT"


HA HA HA....SHE IS SO TRANSPARENT

ABOUT HER NOT WANTING TO BE

TRANSPARENT!!!! 



She noted that 




WinCAM is a first amendment 


organization,



(1st Amendment for "award winner" Melodie

Wing, but not for you!  Look at how the 

malicious Melodie doesn't want to be 

forthright with the community and appears to 

be engaging in double-talk to not put into

place IMMEDIATELY - posted meeting 


minutes

and televised board meetings...

SO MUCH LIKE TV3 MEDFORD!!!!!!

 therefore it is important that the public be 



included in the process. Ms. Wing pointed


 out that the directors have found on 


occasion 


the 




need to meet but not have the ability to follow 


the Open Meeting Law requirements. 


The 




Vice Chairman suggested that any meeting, 


whether public or not, have minutes available 


for public review.